EU Case Law
A and Others
Actions by armed forces during periods of armed conflict, within the meaning of international humanitarian law, may constitute 'terrorist acts' for the purposes of EU law. Therefore, the Grand Chamber upheld the validity of the acts of the European Union relating to the inclusion of the ‘Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam’ (LTTE) on the list of those whose funds are to be frozen. The LTTE is an...
Daniel Adam Poplawski
On the 15th February 2017, AG Bot delivered his Opinion on the Case C-579/15 Openbaar Ministerie v Daniel Adam Poplawski. The latter was subject to an EAW issued by the Polish Regional Court of...
Gerrit van Vemde
On 25 January 2017, the Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber), delivered its judgment on case C-587/15 on the transitional application of the provisions on the transfer of sentenced persons which were...
Tomas Vilkas
On 25 January 2017, the Court of Justice (Third Chamber) delivered its judgment on case C-640/15 on the interpretation of Article 23 of the EAW Framework Decision regarding the time frame for the...
Jozef Grundza
On 11 January 2017, the Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) delivered its judgment in case C-289/15, on the interpretation of Council Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the...
Tele2 Sverige
On 21 December 2017, the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) delivered its much awaited judgment in joined cases C-203/15 and C-698/15, that follows up to the landmark Digital Rights Ireland...
Halil Ibrahim Özçelik
The Halil Ibrahim Özçelik case is part of a trilogy of cases decided in the same week with Krzystof Marek Poltorak and Ruslanas Kovalkovas case about the extent of what a ‘judicial authority’ is...