EU Case Law

Article 54 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement (ne bis in idem) must be interpreted as meaning that: – the relevant criterion for the purposes of the application of that article is identity of the material acts, understood as the existence of a set of facts which are inextricably linked together, irrespective of the legal classification given to them or the legal...

1. Article 54 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement must be interpreted as meaning that: – the relevant criterion for the purposes of the application of that article...

 The Court of First Instance annuls the Council Decision ordering Stichting Al-Aqsa’s funds to be frozen in the fight against terrorism.  The contested decision infringes...

The Court of First Instance annuls the Council Decision ordering Jose Maria Sison’s funds to be frozen in the fight against terrorism. The contested decision infringes the rights of the...

Council Framework Decision on the standing of victims in criminal proceedings, must be interpreted as meaning that, in criminal proceedings and, in particular, in enforcement proceedings following...

Right to a fair trial is not infringed by the imposition on lawyers of the obligations to inform and cooperate with the authorities responsible for combating money laundering when participating in...

The Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States is valid. The removal of verification of double criminality complies with the principle...